'The Sensory Profile provides a standard method for professionals to measure a child's sensory processing abilities and to profile the effect of sensory processing on functional performance in the daily life of a child'-P. The Sensory Profile™ 2 family of assessments provides you with standardized tools to help evaluate a child's sensory processing patterns in the context of everyday life. These significantly revised questionnaires can help you determine how sensory processing may be contributing to or interfering with the child's participation in activities.
Child Sensory Profile 2 User's Manual Pdf Maker
Occupational therapists often use the Sensory Profile and the Sensory Processing Measure to assess the sensory needs of children. Therefore, it is important that the sensory processing scales that therapists use are reliable. The Sensory Processing Measure is a relatively new instrument, published in 2007, whereas the Sensory Profile appeared in 1999. The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability (internal consistency and inter-rater reliability) of the Sensory Profile, the Sensory Profile School Companion (SPSC), and the Home and Main Classroom Forms of the Sensory Processing Measure (SPM) in a cross-cultural setting. Parent participants (30 mothers and 30 fathers) each completed the Sensory Profile and the SPM–Home Form on the same child at ages between 5 and 10 years. Nineteen main classroom teachers of the same children then completed the SPSC and the SPM–Main Classroom Form. The internal consistency Cronbach alpha coefficients for the overall Sensory Profile, SPSC, SPM–Home Form, and SPM–Main Classroom Form were 0.97, 0.94, 0.93, and 0.86 respectively. The inter-rater reliability intra-class correlation coefficients for the overall Sensory Profile and SPM–Home Form were 0.48 (p = .48) and 0.63 (p = .005). Overall, the Sensory Profile and the SPM were found to have adequate levels of internal consistency. The Sensory Profile and SPM–Home Form exhibited moderate levels of inter-rater reliability. This study contributes to the evidence base and body of knowledge regarding internal consistency and inter-rater reliability, which previously consisted of the few studies reported in the respective Sensory Profile and SPM test manuals. This study also demonstrates that the Sensory Profile and SPM are reliable when used in a cross-cultural context.
Using the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile in Early Intervention Services Self-study Module - October 2005 Resources in the ITSP User’s Manual nual Multidisciplinary Evaluation (MDE). The User’s Manual includes detailed information about the theoretical background that underlies the ITSP, procedures used to standardize this. Understand how a parent’s sensory ability can impact a child with sensory difficulties. Identify and develop a client’s awareness and strategies to optimize the desired sensory environment. The Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile includes 60 items (15 items for each quadrant). Add item scores for each section in the questionnaire Complete the quadrant grid located on the summary score page; enter score for each number then add On the quadrant summary, transfer each score from each quadrant to corresponding column Transfer raw score to raw score total. Toddler Sensory Profile 2: 7-35 months Child Sensory Profile 2: 3-14 years Short Sensory Profile 2: 3-14 years School Companion Sensory Profile 2: 3-14 years. Scores: Raw Score based cut scores, percentile ranges, and descriptive categories for: 1. Sensory Patterns Summary (Quadrants) 2. Figure 5.2 illustrates the teacher’s responses to the School CompanionTeacher Questionnaire.Figure 5.3 provides Trevor’s Scoring Summary. Figure 5.4 shows the Quadrant scores from the Sensory Profilecompleted by his parents. 1 SENSORY PROFILE SCHOOL COMPANION “Sensory Profile School Companion” Users Manual Winnie Dunn, Ph.D., OTR, FAOTA.